ASSEMBLY, No. 4814

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

217th LEGISLATURE

 

INTRODUCED MAY 18, 2017

 


 

Sponsored by:

Assemblyman  KEVIN J. ROONEY

District 40 (Bergen, Essex, Morris and Passaic)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Prohibits investment of pension and annuity funds by State in entities that avoid Superfund obligations to State.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

  


An Act concerning the investment by the State of pension and annuity funds in entities that avoid their Superfund obligations to the State and supplementing P.L.1950, c.270 (C.52:18A-79 et seq.).

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

1.      The Legislature finds and declares that:

     The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), commonly known as Superfund, provides for the cleanup of some of the nation’s most contaminated hazardous waste sites by assigning responsibility for the expense of the cleanup to the entity that caused the contamination, so that taxpayers and residents are not forced to pay for very costly remediation.

     Because New Jersey has a long history of chemical and other industrial manufacturing, the State has more Superfund sites than any other state in the country, making cleanup and remediation of these Superfund sites particularly critical for the well-being of the State’s residents.

     One example of a Superfund site in the State is the site in Newark where, for several decades, Diamond Alkali Company, purchased later by Maxus Energy Corporation, manufactured agricultural chemicals, including the herbicide known as Agent Orange.  The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found high levels of dioxin at the Diamond Alkali facility and placed the site on the Superfund National Priorities List in 1984.  Several other hazardous substances and semi-volatile and volatile compounds were also discovered at the site.

     The hazardous substances and semi-volatile and volatile compounds have contaminated the environment at and around the site, including the soil, groundwater, air, surface water, and building structures at the site, as well as caused widespread contamination in the Passaic River.  The contamination in the river is so severe that there are prohibitions and advisories on fish and crab consumption in the area.

     Subsequent to the designation of the Superfund site, the Argentinian state-owned oil company, YPF S.A., acquired Maxus Energy Corporation.

     In March 2016, the EPA announced its finding that remediation of the Diamond Alkali site would cost $1.38 billion.

     Three months following the EPA’s announcement, YPF S.A. placed Maxus Energy Corporation into bankruptcy, ultimately stripping it of its assets and rendering it unable to fulfill its Superfund obligations for the Diamond Alkali site. Nevertheless, YPF S.A. remains a profitable business.

     New Jersey has a significant interest in ensuring these Superfund sites no longer post a threat to its residents, and if responsible parties are able to avoid the expense of a cleanup of Superfund sites without consequence, then the State should not allow those parties to continue to profit from the State’s investments.

     By prohibiting the Department of the Treasury from investing in these entities, responsible parties that avoid their Superfund obligations may realize their actions are not without consequence and perhaps will be deterred from doing so in the future.

 

     2.    a.  Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, no assets of any pension or annuity fund under the jurisdiction of the Division of Investment in the Department of the Treasury, or its successor, shall be invested in any business, or country or its instrumentality, or any such entity that has an equity tie with any of the aforsaid, that has been identified as a responsible party, with or without adjudication or other finding of responsibility, by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. s.9601 et seq., for a Superfund site in the State, upon that business entity, country or country’s instrumentalities filing for bankruptcy or otherwise rendering that company, or country, or country’s instrumentality incapable of complying with its obligations, in whole or in part, for a Superfund site in the State for which it has been identified as a responsible party.

     As used in this act, “equity tie” means an ownership stake or joint venture.

     b.    The State Investment Council and the Director of the Division of Investment, after consulting with an independent research firm that specializes in global security risk for portfolio determinations selected by the State Treasurer, shall take appropriate action to sell, redeem, divest, or withdraw any investment held in violation of subsection a. of this section.  This section shall not be construed to require the premature or otherwise imprudent sale, redemption, divestment, or withdrawal of an investment, but such sale, redemption, divestment, or withdrawal shall be completed not later than three years following the effective date of this act, P.L.    , c.    (C.         ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill).

     c.     Within 60 days after the effective date of this act, P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), the Director of the Division of Investment shall file with the Legislature, pursuant to section 2 of P.L.1991, c.164 (C.52:14-19.1), a report of all investments held as of the effective date that are in violation of subsection a. of this section.  Every year thereafter, the director shall report on all investments sold, redeemed, divested, or withdrawn in compliance with subsection b. of this section.

     Each report after the initial report shall provide a description of the progress that the division has made since the previous report and since the enactment of this act, P.L.    , c.    (C.        ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill) in implementing subsection b. of this section.

     d.    The members of the State Investment Council, jointly and individually, and State officers and employees involved therewith, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the State of New Jersey from all claims, demands, suits, actions, damages, judgments, costs, charges, and expenses, including court costs and attorney's fees, and against all liability, losses, and damages that these council members, and State officers and employees, may sustain by reason of any decision to restrict, reduce, or eliminate investments pursuant to this act.

 

3.      This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill would prohibit the investment of New Jersey public employee retirement funds in any company, country, or country’s instrumentality that avoids its Superfund obligations to the State by filing for bankruptcy or otherwise rendering a company or instrumentality incapable of fulfilling its responsibilities, in whole or in part, for a Superfund site in the State for which it has been identified as a responsible party.

     The Diamond Alkali Company Superfund Site has had a detrimental effect on the State’s soil, waters, air, and people.  The contaminants from the site have tainted the fish and wildlife in the area of the Passaic River that was impacted to the point that prohibitions and advisories on consumption of fish and crabs from the area are in place. 

     After a long-awaited decision from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in March 2016, the EPA announced that remediation of the Diamond Alkali Company Superfund site would cost $1.38 billion.

     Just three months following this announcement, YPF S.A., the Argentinian state-owned company that acquired Maxus Energy Corporation (previously Diamond Alkali Company) placed Maxus Energy into bankruptcy, ultimately stripping it of its assets and leaving it unable to fulfill its Superfund obligations for the Diamond Alkali site. Nevertheless, YPF S.A. remains a profitable business.

     Considering the devastating impact these Superfund sites have on the State’s residents and the environment, entities avoiding their Superfund obligations should be aware that avoiding such responsibility will not be without consequence.