ASSEMBLY, No. 3777

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

218th LEGISLATURE

 

INTRODUCED APRIL 5, 2018

 


 

Sponsored by:

Assemblywoman  BETTYLOU DECROCE

District 26 (Essex, Morris and Passaic)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Provides school district tax levy cap adjustment for certain special education costs; limits sending district per pupil tuition increase to 2%; and provides increased representation on receiving board of education for certain sending districts.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

  


An Act concerning school districts and amending P.L.2007, c.62, N.J.S.18A:38-19, and P.L.1995, c.8.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.    Section 3 of P.L.2007, c.62 (C.18A:7F-38) is amended to read as follows:

     3.    a.  Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, a school district shall not adopt a budget pursuant to sections 5 and 6 of P.L.1996, c.138 (C.18A:7F-5 and 18A:7F-6) with an increase in its adjusted tax levy that exceeds, except as provided in subsection e. of section 4 of P.L.2007, c.62 (C.18A:7F-39), the tax levy growth limitation calculated as follows: the sum of the prebudget year adjusted tax levy and the adjustment for increases in enrollment multiplied by 2.0 percent, and adjustments for an increase in health care costs, an increase in special education costs over $40,000 per pupil, and increases in amounts for certain normal and accrued liability pension contributions set forth in sections 1 and 2 of P.L.2009, c.19 amending section 24 of P.L.1954, c.84 (C.43:15A-24) and section 15 of P.L.1944, c.255 (C.43:16A-15) for the year set forth in those sections.

     b.    (1)     The allowable adjustment for increases in enrollment authorized pursuant to subsection a. of this section shall equal the per pupil prebudget year adjusted tax levy multiplied by EP, where EP equals the sum of:

     (a)   0.50 for each unit of weighted resident enrollment that constitutes an increase from the prebudget year over 1%, but not more than 2.5%;

     (b)   0.75 for each unit of weighted resident enrollment that constitutes an increase from the prebudget year over 2.5%, but not more than 4%; and

     (c)   1.00 for each unit of weighted resident enrollment that constitutes an increase from the prebudget year over 4%.

     (2)   A school district may request approval from the commissioner to calculate EP equal to 1.00 for any increase in weighted resident enrollment if it can demonstrate that the calculation pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection would result in an average class size that exceeds 10% above the facilities efficiency standards established pursuant to P.L.2000, c.72 (C.18A:7G-1 et al.).

     c.     (Deleted by amendment, P.L.2010, c.44)

     d.    (1)     The allowable adjustment for increases in health care costs authorized pursuant to subsection a. of this section shall equal

that portion of the actual increase in total health care costs for the budget year, less any withdrawals from the current expense emergency reserve account for increases in total health care costs, that exceeds 2.0 percent of the total health care costs in the prebudget year, but that is not in excess of the product of the total health care costs in the prebudget year multiplied by the average percentage increase of the State Health Benefits Program, P.L.1961, c.49 (C.52:14-17.25 et seq.), as annually determined by the Division of Pensions and Benefits in the Department of the Treasury.

     (2)   The allowable adjustment for increases in the amount of normal and accrued liability pension contributions authorized pursuant to subsection a. of this section shall equal that portion of the actual increase in total normal and accrued liability pension contributions for the budget year that exceeds 2.0 percent of the total normal and accrued liability pension contributions in the prebudget year.

     (3)   The allowable adjustment for an increase in special education costs over $40,000 per pupil authorized pursuant to subsection a. of this section shall equal any increase in the sum of per pupil amounts in excess of $40,000 for the budget year less the sum of per pupil amounts in excess of $40,000 for the prebudget year indexed by 2.0 percent.

     e.     (Deleted by amendment, P.L.2010, c.44)

     f.     The adjusted tax levy shall be increased or decreased accordingly whenever the responsibility and associated cost of a school district activity is transferred to another school district or governmental entity.

(cf: P.L.2010, c.44, s.4)

 

     2.    N.J.S.18A:38-19 is amended to read as follows:

     18A:38-19.  a.  Whenever the pupils of any school district are attending public school in another district, within or without the State, pursuant to this article, the board of education of the receiving district shall determine a tuition rate to be paid by the board of education of the sending district to an amount not in excess of the actual cost per pupil as determined under rules prescribed by the commissioner and approved by the State board, and such tuition shall be paid by the board secretary or treasurer of school moneys, as appropriate, of the sending district out of any moneys in his hands available for current expenses of the district upon order issued by the board of education of the sending district, signed by its president and secretary, in favor of the board secretary or treasurer of school moneys, as appropriate, of the receiving district.

     b.    Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection a. of this section to the contrary, whenever the pupils of a school district are attending public school in another district within the State, any increase in the per pupil tuition amount between the prebudget and budget years shall not exceed 2%.

(cf: P.L.2010, c.39, s.26)

 

     3.    Section 2 of P.L.1995, c.8 (C.18A:38-8.2) is amended to read as follows:

     2.    A school district which is sending pupils to another school district pursuant to N.J.S.18A:38-8 shall have representation on the board of education of the receiving school district as follows:

     a.     (1)     If the pupils of the sending district comprise less than 10 percent of the total enrollment of the pupils in the grades of the receiving district in which the pupils of the sending district will be enrolled, the sending district shall have no representation on the receiving district board of education.

     (2)   If the pupils of the sending district comprise at least 10 percent of the total enrollment of the pupils in the grades of the receiving district in which the pupils of the sending district will be enrolled, the sending district shall have [one representative] two representatives on the receiving district board of education.

     b.    If the total number of pupils of two or more sending districts, which do not qualify for representation under subsection a. of this section, comprise at least 15 percent of the total enrollment of the pupils in the grades of the receiving district in which the pupils of the sending districts will be enrolled, they shall have collectively two representatives on the receiving district board of education.  The annual designation of the representatives, in the event more than two districts collectively qualify under this subsection, shall be rotated among the boards of education of the sending districts according to a schedule determined by the joint agreement of the boards.

     c.     Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections a. and b. of this section, the number of representatives designated by the sending districts to be additional members shall not exceed three additional members on a receiving board with originally nine or more members, two additional members on a receiving board with originally seven or eight members, and one additional member on a receiving board with originally less than seven members.  In the event that this restriction results in an unequal representation of sending districts, the annual designation of the representative or representatives shall be rotated among the boards of education of the sending districts according to a schedule determined by the joint agreement of the boards.

     d.    A representative of a sending district board of education shall be designated at the meeting of the board which is closest in time to the annual organizational meeting of the receiving district board of education and shall serve a one-year term beginning with the organizational meeting of the receiving district board.  The representative shall be subject to the rules and procedures of the receiving district board of education.

     e.     The calculation of percentages required under this section shall be based on the number of pupils reported as of the last school day prior to October 16 of each prebudget year.

(cf: P.L.1996, c.138, s.65)

 

     4.    This act shall take effect immediately.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill authorizes an adjustment to the school district tax levy cap for the amount of the increase in special education costs over $40,000 per pupil that exceeds the amount of such costs in the prior year by more than 2%.  This adjustment reflects the fact that the cost of providing programs and services to some special education students is significant, and having to accommodate these costs within the base 2% cap would have a detrimental effect on the district’s ability to provide appropriate educational services to other students enrolled in the district.

     The bill also limits the annual increase in the per pupil amount of tuition charged to a sending district by a receiving district to 2%.  The purpose of this provision is to have the allowable increase in per pupil tuition cost reflect the allowable annual increase in a sending school district’s tax levy.

     Finally, the bill amends current law concerning the representation of a sending school district on the board of education of the receiving school district.  Under current law, if the students of the sending district comprise at least 10% of the total enrollment in the grades of the receiving district in which the students of the sending district are enrolled, the sending district has one representative on the receiving district board of education.  This bill provides that such sending districts will have two representatives on the receiving district board of education.