ASSEMBLY CONCURRENT RESOLUTION No. 73

 

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

 

INTRODUCED MAY 6, 1996

 

 

By Assemblymen ZECKER, BLEE and LeFevre

 

 

A Concurrent Resolution proposing an amendment to Article I, paragraph 7 of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey.

 

    Be It Resolved by the General Assembly of the State of New Jersey (the Senate concurring):

 

    1. The following proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of New Jersey is hereby agreed to:

 

 

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

 

    Amend Article I, paragraph 7 to read as follows:

    7. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue except upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the papers and things to be seized. Except as specifically provided by law, evidence which is obtained as a result of a search or seizure and which is otherwise admissible shall not be excluded in a proceeding in a court of this State if the search or seizure was undertaken in a reasonable, good faith belief that it was in conformity with the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United States and in conformity with this paragraph.

(cf: Art. I, para.7)

 

    2. When this proposed amendment to the Constitution is finally agreed to pursuant to Article IX, paragraph 1 of the Constitution, it shall be submitted to the people at the next general election occurring more than three months after the final agreement and shall be published at least once in at least one newspaper of each county designated by the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the General Assembly and the Secretary of State, not less than three months prior to the general election.

    3. This proposed amendment to the Constitution shall be submitted to the people at that election in the following manner and form:

    There shall be printed on each official ballot to be used at the general election, the following:

    a. In every municipality in which voting machines are not used, a legend which shall immediately precede the question, as follows:

    If you favor the proposition printed below make a cross (X), plus (+) or check (•) in the square opposite the word 'Yes.' If you are opposed thereto make a cross (X), plus (+) or check (•) in the square opposite the word 'No.'

    In every municipality the following question:



 

 

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT:

SEARCHES AND SEIZURES








 

YES

Shall the amendment to Article I, paragraph 7 of the Constitution be adopted so that evidence obtained as a result of a good faith search or seizure may be admissible in a court of this State providing the law enforcement officer obtained the evidence while acting in a reasonable belief that the search or seizure was constitutional?

 

 

INTERPRETIVE STATEMENT











 

NO

This amendment would affect the provision of the Constitution concerning searches and seizures. This provision has been interpreted by the courts to exclude certain evidence from being admitted into court. This amendment would allow evidence obtained as a result of a search or seizure to be admitted in a court of this State provided the law enforcement officer obtained the evidence while acting in a reasonable, good faith belief that the search or seizure was constitutionally proper.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

    Article I, paragraph 7 of the New Jersey Constitution establishes the right of the people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures. This provision has been interpreted by the courts to exclude evidence from being admitted into court if the evidence is obtained as a result of a search or seizure in technical violation of the rules regarding searches and seizures.

    This amendment allows evidence obtained as a result of a search or seizure to be admitted into a court of this State provided the law enforcement officer obtained the evidence while acting in a reasonable good faith belief that the search or seizure was constitutionally proper.

 

 

                             

 

Proposes an amendment to the Constitution to provide for a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule of evidence.