SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION No. 42

 

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

 

INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 5, 1996

 

 

By Senator SCHLUTER

 

 

A Concurrent Resolution proposing to amend Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 4 of the Constitution of the State of New Jersey.

 

Whereas, Taxes assessed and levied against real property account for approximately forty percent of all tax revenues raised in this State each year, with a great deal of the resultant burden falling on homeowners, a burden which is particularly onerous for senior citizens and disabled persons who are less than 65 years of age; and

Whereas, Many senior citizens and disabled persons are bearing an increasingly unfair share of the property tax burden in that they live on fixed incomes which do not allow them to keep pace with the growth of property taxes; and

Whereas, Property tax increases not only undermine the continued ability of senior citizens and disabled persons to meet their tax payments, but also threaten their status as homeowners; and

Whereas, It is not in the interest of fairness, equitability or public policy that senior citizens and disabled persons of limited means be forced to sell their homes or, for those in dire circumstances, be threatened by tax sale at a time in their lives when they are least able to cope with the dislocations and trauma of relocation; and

Whereas, Municipalities benefit from the presence of a diverse mix of residents and should be allowed to take whatever measures are necessary to help senior citizens and disabled persons to remain municipal residents by helping to relieve their local tax burden without placing an undue burden on other municipal residents; and

Whereas, Municipalities should be provided with the flexibility necessary to establish a local share tax deduction over and above the existing tax deduction in order to relieve the property tax burden on the part of senior citizens and disabled persons of limited means to the extent possible; now, therefore,

 

    BE IT RESOLVED by the Senate of the State of New Jersey (the General Assembly concurring):

    1. The following proposed amendment to the Constitution of the State of New Jersey is agreed to:

 

PROPOSED AMENDMENT

 

    Amend Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 4 to read as follows:

    4. The Legislature may, from time to time, enact laws granting an annual deduction, from the amount of any tax bill for taxes on the real property, and from taxes attributable to a residential unit in a cooperative or mutual housing corporation, of any citizen and resident of this State of the age of 65 or more years, or any citizen and resident of this State less than 65 years of age who is permanently and totally disabled according to the provisions of the Federal Social Security Act, residing in a dwelling house owned by him which is a constituent part of such real property, or residing in a dwelling house owned by him which is assessed as real property but which is situated on land owned by another or others, or residing as tenant-shareholder in a cooperative or mutual housing corporation, but no such deduction shall be in excess of $160.00 with respect to any year prior to 1981, $200.00 per year in 1981, $225.00 per year in 1982, and $250.00 per year in 1983 and any year thereafter and such deduction shall be restricted to owners having an income not in excess of $5,000.00 per year with respect to any year prior to 1981, $8,000.00 per year in 1981, $9,000.00 per year in 1982, and $10,000.00 per year in 1983 and any year thereafter, exclusive of benefits under any one of the following:

    a. The Federal Social Security Act and all amendments and supplements thereto;

    b. Any other program of the federal government or pursuant to any other federal law which provides benefits in whole or in part in lieu of benefits referred to in, or for persons excluded from coverage under, a. hereof including but not limited to the Federal Railroad Retirement Act and federal pension, disability and retirement programs; or

    c. Pension, disability or retirement programs of any state or its political subdivisions, or agencies thereof, for persons not covered under a. hereof; provided, however, that the total amount of benefits to be allowed exclusion by any owner under b. or c. hereof shall not be in excess of the maximum amount of benefits payable to, and allowable for exclusion by, an owner in similar circumstances under a. hereof.

    The Legislature shall enact laws to authorize any municipality in which a question has been approved by referendum held not less than 90 days following the passage of an ordinance by a two-thirds vote of the governing body to establish a local share tax deduction that, within the municipality, increases the amount of the deduction authorized pursuant to this paragraph or changes the income eligibility for the deduction authorized pursuant to this paragraph or both; provided, however, that the total deduction including the local share, shall not exceed twice the amount of the deduction authorized pursuant to this paragraph and the income eligibility may not exceed twice the income eligibility threshold set forth in this paragraph. The ordinance and referendum question shall specify the amount of the increase in the tax deduction or the change in income eligibility for the deduction, as the case may be, and the local share, if approved, shall take effect in the calendar year following the holding of the referendum and be applicable in each year thereafter. A local share tax deduction, if approved, may be rescinded only according to the procedure set forth herein for the approval of the local share. A referendum on the question of establishing a local share tax deduction shall not occur more than once in every three years. The cost of the local share tax deduction, which shall include the cost of any increase in the amount of the deduction and the cost of any increase in the income eligibility for the deduction, shall be met by the taxing district.

    The surviving spouse of a deceased citizen and resident of the State who during his or her life received a deduction pursuant to this paragraph shall be entitled, so long as he or she shall remain unmarried and a resident of the same dwelling house situated on the same land with respect to which said deduction was granted, to the same deduction, upon the same conditions, with respect to the same real property or with respect to the same dwelling house which is situated on land owned by another or others, or with respect to the same cooperative or mutual housing corporation, notwithstanding that said surviving spouse is under the age of 65 and is not permanently and totally disabled, provided that said surviving spouse is 55 years of age or older.

    Any such deduction when so granted by law shall be granted so that it will not be in addition to any other deduction or exemption, except a deduction granted under authority of paragraph 3 of this section, to which the said citizen and resident may be entitled, but said citizen and resident may receive in addition any homestead rebate or credit provided by law. The State shall annually reimburse each taxing district in an amount equal to one-half of the tax loss to the district resulting from the allowance of tax deductions, except for local share tax deductions, pursuant to this paragraph.

(cf: Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 4 amended effective December 8, 1988.)

 

    2. When this proposed amendment to the Constitution is finally agreed to pursuant to Article IX, paragraph 1 of the Constitution, it shall be submitted to the people at the next general election occurring more than three months after the final agreement and shall be published at least once in at least one newspaper of each county designated by the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the General Assembly and the Secretary of State, not less than three months prior to the general election.

 

    3. This proposed amendment to the Constitution shall be submitted to the people at that election in the following manner and form:

    There shall be printed on each official ballot to be used at the general election, the following:

    a. In every municipality in which voting machines are not used, a legend which shall immediately precede the question, as follows:

    If you favor the proposition printed below make a cross (X), plus (+) or check () in the square opposite the word "Yes." If you are opposed thereto make a cross (X), plus (+) or check () in the square opposite the word "No."

    b. In every municipality the following question:

 






 

 

AUTHORIZES MUNICIPALITIES TO ESTABLISH LOCAL SHARE SENIOR CITIZEN AND DISABLED PROPERTY TAX DEDUCTION BY ORDINANCE AND REFERENDUM AND AT MUNICIPAL EXPENSE.
















 

YES

Shall the amendment to Article VIII, Section I, paragraph 4 of the Constitution, agreed to by the Legislature, and requiring the Legislature to authorize muncipalities to establish a local share property tax deduction for senior citizens and disabled persons which would increase the existing property deduction to a maximum of twice the amount of the deduction currently authorized or increase the income eligibility threshold for the deduction to a maximum of twice the current income eligibility threshold, or both, by referendum submitted to municipal voters upon passage of an ordinance by a two-thirds vote of the governing body, which benefit is to be a municipal expense, be approved?

 

 

INTERPRETIVE STATEMENT
























 

NO

This proposed amendment would require the Legislature to permit municipalities to establish a local share tax deduction which, with the existing property tax deduction for senior citizens of 65 years of age or older and disabled persons who are under 65 years of age and totally and permanently disabled would provide up to a maximum of $500. A municipality would also be permitted to establish a local share tax deduction that would increase the income eligibility threshold for the local share deduction to a maximum of $20,000 per year. To establish a local share deduction, the governing body would approve an ordinance by a two-thirds vote, and the voters would approve a referendum submitted to them not less than 90 days following adoption of the ordinance. The municipality would be required to absorb the cost of the local share tax deduction, including the cost of any increase in the amount of the deduction and the cost of any increase in the income eligibility for the deduction.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

    This proposed amendment to the Constitution would require the Legislature to permit municipalities to establish a local share tax deduction for senior citizens who are 65 years of age or older or persons who are under 65 but are totally and permanently disabled. Currently, the Constitution limits this benefit to $250 per year and establishes an income threshold of $10,000.00 per year. The total deduction including the local share would be capped at $500 per year or involve an increase in the threshold to $20,000.00 per year or both, with the extra cost being incurred by the municipality.

    In order to establish a local share, the municipal governing body would have to approve an ordinance to that effect by a vote of at least two-thirds of governing body members. The question would then have to be submitted to the voters not less than 90 days following adoption of the ordinance. Both the ordinance and the referendum question would be required to include the amount of the deduction and income eligibility threshold which would constitute the local share. This Constitutional amendment requires the municipality to absorb the cost represented by the local share.

    The Constitutional amendment limits the holding of such a referendum to once in any three year period and provides that the local share may be rescinded, but only through the same process used to establish the local share. If approved, the local share would take effect in the calendar year following approval of the referendum.

 

 

 

Proposes constitutional amendment to permit municipalities to establish local share senior citizen and disabled property tax deduction.